Wednesday, December 28, 2011
The barefoot running craze came in the wake of the popular book by Christopher McDougall, entitled, Born to Run. The author took reference to the Tarahumara Indians of Mexico who ran long distances barefoot. To be fare, speaking as a shoe historian, indigenous populations did not have the craft nor know how to make shoes to last and so running barefoot was a necessity which we will never know whether having running shoes available then would have changed the face of history. So his logic is somewhat flawed.
However this disappointment with technology came at a time when many people were generally disillusioned by the factious claims of manufactures (and scientists) that expensive sports shoes were good for you. The absence of record breaking performances at the Olympics confirmed to many: ‘shoes do not maketh the athlete’. In a bid to overcome this human failing many runners chose to avoid full fashion designer sports gear in preference for minimalist footwear. Others abandoned footwear altogether to run au, naturelle (feet, that is).
An elementary understanding of human locomotion confirms the difference between walking and running cycles. On flat surfaces heel strike is perfectly normal up until middle distance running where forefoot contact then supersedes heel contact. Things become slightly more complex over uneven and tilted surfaces. Traditionally the design of athletic footwear (up to running up to middle distance) has included a heel whereas sprinting shoes have no heel. The current barefoot running craze is driven by shoe companies crossing the barrier and looking to develop new markets for their products using new polymer technology. Lighter and more durable foot gloves are challenging the traditional shoe.
In a study published a few years ago by a Harvard professor (Daniel Lieberman), he looked at runners who ran with or without shoes. The collected data indicated barefoot endurance runners often landed on the fore-foot before bringing down the heel, while shod runners mostly had a rear-foot strike. They concluded raised and cushioned heels in modern running shoes may account for this running gait. Further analysis suggested barefoot runners generated less impact with forefoot strike than rear-foot strikers in shoes and the former had a springier step which implied more efficient use calf and foot muscles. Researchers were clear however the evidence did not suggest barefoot running suffered fewer injuries.
More recently another Harvard academic (Irene Davis ), reported her latest findings and according to Davis, avoiding heel contact during running can help reduce shock related injuries when wearing barefoot style shoes. The underlying hypothesis is wearing heeled sport shoes introduces an artificial ‘heel strike phase’ when the weight bearing limb is subjected to repeated high impact forces (the equivalent to two to three times body weight) and hence potential for repetitive injury.
In another injury, function and rehabilitation study published in the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, researchers compared barefoot running to wearing running shoes and concluded wearing running shoes was seen to increase strain on weight bearing joints i.e. hip, knee and ankle joints. Disproportionately large increases were observed in the hip internal rotation torque (54%); and in the knee flexion (36%); and knee varus torques (38%) when running in running shoes compared with barefoot. Researchers were also surprised to note knee torque was higher in running shoes than values recorded in a previous study to determine knee torque during high-heeled shoes during walking. The authors believe these findings confirm the typical construction of modern-day running shoes provides good support and protection of the foot but also increases stress on the lower extremity weight bearing joints. Researchers believe this may be due to the elevated heel of the running shoe combined with the increased material under the medial arch.
For some these scientific studies are pretty convincing but it is important to know the test conditions for each research project, in particular to the claims made by the authors. Pressure analysis in situ (in viva) is complex and most studies involve (in vitro) or laboratory testing, usually on a treadmill. This can make extrapolation difficult. Most of the gait studies used involve small numbers and are not independent studies (sponsored by footwear companies) which further complicates the published findings. So the jury is still out.
However running across hard surfaces increases the risk of injury from sharp objects like broken glass or discarded needles etc. which would suggest a protective foot cover as an intelligent precautionary measure. Contrary to market rhetoric shoes do not enhance performance enhance and whilst we may be born to run (barefoot), sadly the ravages of age, illness and hard surfaces mean our choices are restricted. As we age and older adults take up walking and jogging it makes good sense to protect the feet from serendipitous injuries because of impaired immune systems and compromised circulation and nerve supplies. All of which can compromise life style disease such as diabetes. To that effect shoes which comfortably fit the foot and are appropriate to use over hard surfaces and duration would seem to make good sense.
The American Council on Exercise (ACE), is North America's leading authority on fitness and the world's largest nonprofit fitness certification, education and training organization. The Council recently announced the results of a small, independent study conducted at the University of Wisconsin, La Crosse, Exercise and Health Program on sock-style shoes. The study found that while barefoot style shoes may be beneficial for some who suffer from chronic running injuries, they can pose additional risks if runners who do not adopt their correct foot-to-ground strike style.
Common leg injuries
Endurance athletes suffer stress fractures in the hip, the femur (thigh), tibia (shin) and feet. They are due to the repetitive impact and rotation caused by contraction of the muscles attached to them.
Exercise induced compartment syndrome is a condition that causes pain over the front and outer edge of the leg with activity e.g. Anterior Compartment Syndrome Posterior Shin Splints describes pain on the inner side of your leg, right where the calf muscle meets the big shin bone. If the pain is severe a stress fracture in the tibia may be present.
Ankle sprains are common injuries that runners experience. Early recognition and treatment of this problem will help speed your recovery from ankle ligament injuries.
Achilles tendonitis is a painful condition of the tendon in the back of the ankle. Left untreated, Achilles tendonitis can lead to an increased risk of Achilles tendon rupture.
Arch pain is a common foot complaint. Repetitive strain often causes inflammation and a burning sensation under the arch of the foot. Treatment of arch pain often consists of adaptive footwear and inserts (orthoses).
Plantar fasciitis is a major cause of heel pain due to inflammation to micro tears of the plantar fascia along the base of the foot. A tight, inflamed plantar fascia can cause pain when walking or running, and be found in conjunction with a heel spur.
Pronation is a normal movement of the subtalar joint through the gait cycle. When this motion becomes prolonged, delayed supination can cause a change in normal mechanics of the gait cycle. Shoes and orthoses to reduce full range joint motion can be help reduced associated symptoms.
If you have any of these symptoms then please consult your own physician.